Norwood City Council

Council Chambers

May 22, 2007

 

 

 

A)  CALL TO ORDER

The Council for the City of Norwood met in regular session on the above date with Ms. Jane Grote presiding.  The meeting opened with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

B)   PRAYER

 

C)  PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 

D)  ROLL CALL

On roll call, the following members answered present:  Mr. Gabbard, Mr. Sanker, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Moore, Mr. Barlow, and Mr. Mumper.

 

E)   AMENDMENT OF AGENDA

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to amend the agenda by adding Committee Reports G-4), G-5), and G-6).  All members present voted YES.

 

F)   requests to address council on agenda items

There were no requests to address Council.

 

The Chair noted Ms. Kelly is now in Council Chambers

 

G)  REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF COUNCIL

 

1.      Community Development RE: Cornerstone Design Review – Water Feature

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to accept the

report.  All members present voted YES.

 

2.      Community Development RE: Linden Pointe Historical Feature

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Barlow, it was moved to accept the

report.  All members present voted YES.

 

3.      Community Development RE: Linden Pointe Redevelopment Agreements

 

Mr. Schneider asked Mr. Moore, through the Chair, if the Bridge enhancements are part of these agreements.  Mr. Moore confirmed that the Bridge Enhancements are included and encouraged fellow Council members to review the list of public improvements.   The current details include landscaping, bridge enhancements, and the historical monument. 

 

Mr. Moore added that during the latest review Mr. Steele, Mr. Burke, and Mr. Quinn were present to review the agreements.  Based on their review, the City’s interests are protected and a letter has been sent to the Law Department for their review.  We are hopeful that these documents will be available for the Council next meeting and that Mr. Dettmer, Mr. Quinn, and Mr. Burke will be available to address Council.  Mr. Moore also explained that Mr. Dettmer has a draft rendering of the historical monument.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Ms. Kelly, it was moved to accept the

report.  All members present voted YES.

 

As amended, Council then considered the following items:

 

4.      Finance & Audit RE: 2007 Appropriations

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to accept the report and to send a copy of the report to the Auditor’s Office.  All members present voted YES.

 

5.      Finance & Audit RE: 2007 Appropriations

 

Mr. Sanker mentioned that there are a large number of P.O.’s and Requisitions that are either not approved or not paid.  There are several overdue items.

 

Mr. Moore added that to add to the issues, the Auditor’s office has not responded with a reason that these bills have not been paid.  We should do anything we can to get these paid and resolved.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to accept the

report and to send a copy of the report to the Auditor’s Office.  All members present voted YES.

 

6.      Finance & Audit RE: Dura Patch Machine and Street Sweeper

 

Mr. Schneider mentioned that while we have discussed quite a few purchases recently this is a big one and was well received by Public Works.  There are other discussions that we will have to have soon including street sweepers, fire department equipment, etc.  The DuraPatch machine is a wise investment in our street program.

 

Mr. Sanker added that this will help to repair and maintain our present streets proactively.  Mr. Sanker encouraged residents to check out the intersection at Fenwick and Glenside where this equipment was demonstrated.  Not a fix all, but does a great job on small areas and a far more effective and permanent solution than traditional cold patch.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to accept the report.  All members present voted YES.

 

H)  ADMINISTRATION REPORTS

 

Mayor Williams was present and mentioned that Mr. Thompson and Ms. Thomas from the State Auditor’s Office are present and available to address Council regarding the 2007 Forecast Analysis.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and allow Dave Thompson and Anna Mary Thomas from the State Auditor’s Office to address Council, with as much time as is needed, regarding the Financial Forecast for 2007.  All members present voted YES.

 

Mr. David Thompson and Ms. Anne Mary Thomas presented the Analysis of the 2007 Forecast to Council.  The Forecast was prepared by the City of Norwood’s Auditor’s Office and was analyzed and confirmed by the State Auditor’s Office.  Mr. Thompson explained the process and Ms. Thomas presented the analysis and document in detail.    Ms. Thomas requested that at the completion of the presentation that Council sign a Letter of representation that confirms that the analysis was completed by the Auditor’s Office, but the raw numbers and assumptions were provided by the City Auditor’s Office.

 

When opened for questions Mr. Moore mentioned that it appears that there are no forecasted deficits in 2007 and that 2006 there was not a deficit and asked what the appropriate steps were to officially get out of Fiscal Watch.  Mr. Thompson confirmed and explained that there are essentially three things that are required to come out of Fiscal Watch.  The first is that 2006 ends without a deficit, the second is that there is a solvent 2007 forecast, and the third is that the City Auditor’s office provide a year ending G.A.A.P report.

 

Mr. Moore asked if the GAAP report was to be completed by the City or the State.  Mr. Thompson responded that the GAAP report was the responsibility of the City.  Mr. Jones, City Auditor has been contacted and while no timeline has been discussed, Mr. Jones was concerned with the capacity of his office and is exploring external options for completing the GAAP report.

 

Mr. Schneider commented that he was concerned with the timing of the delivery of the report and asked why this was not included in the packets and expressed concern in signing a document a few minutes after receiving the report.  Mr. Thompson explained that until the report is final these documents are confidential and cannot be shared or distributed.

 

Mr. Mumper commented that it is important that we do what we can tonight so that we can remove the Fiscal Watch tag as soon as possible and asked the Mayor for his comments.  Mayor Williams responded that he understands the concern of Mr. Schneider but that the forecast was not permitted to be distributed prior to tonight.  We should, however, do everything we can to officially get out of Fiscal Watch.  There are prospective companies considering a move to the Norwood area that have serious questions about the Fiscal Watch status.  We would hope to have this resolved as soon as possible.  Furthermore, the City Auditor’s Office provided these numbers originally and other City employees have been through this report with a fine tooth comb.

 

Mr. Mumper added that all we are confirming is the status of the Forecast.  Forecasts will change multiple times as actuals are reported.

 

Mr. Schneider reiterated his concern with the timing of the delivery of this report but agreed with Mr. Mumper regarding the constantly changing nature of a forecast. 

 

Mr. Thompson explained that until these documents are final they cannot be made public or even be left behind.  All copies of this document must remain in possession of the State Auditor’s Office.  This is why they could not be distributed in Council Packets.  In fact, after the vote tonight the copies of these reports must be collected and returned to the State Auditor’s office until such a time that these documents are made public.

 

Ms. Grote announced that a 5 minute recess would be taken allowing Council Members to make a decision regarding the signature of the Letter of Representation.

 

Upon returning from recess, Ms. Grote confirmed that all Council members, the Mayor, and the President of Council have all signed the document.

 

Mr. Thompson explained that these are considered DRAFT documents until they are approved and these copies cannot be left behind until that time.  Mr. Thompson offered to come to City Hall on Wednesday to go over these copies, but they cannot be released until they are final.  This is precisely why these reports were not given to the Clerk of Council’s office to be distributed in packets. 

 

Mr. Mumper commented that Council ought to be permitted to keep these DRAFTs for review and keep in confidence.  At the very least, Mr. Mumper stated he would like his copy back as he, and others, were taking notes on these copies.

 

When the Mayor’s Administration Report continued, Mayor Williams mentioned that the pony keg at Worth Avenue has finally been demolished.  This was a cooperative effort worked extensively by Mr. Mumper, Mr. Geers, and Mr. Dettmer.  The Tree Board is looking to landscape this area.

 

Mayor Williams also mentioned that the HIPPY graduation picnic is scheduled for this Thursday at Lower Millcrest Park at 5pm.

 

The Mayor also thanked the WNNA for their efforts in organizing the recent cleanup.  It was well attended and a productive event.

 

Mayor Williams encouraged all residents to attend the upcoming Memorial Day ceremony.  It is an important reminder to hear from those who have sacrificed for our freedom.

 

Mayor Williams also provided updates on many current and upcoming projects.  The final course of blacktop is down on the Williams Ave. project, the Montgomery Rd. realignment project will begin this week, current work at Linden Pointe is preparing for blacktopping and curbing, demolition has started for Regal Records and the Belvedere Café, and that permits are beginning to be issued for the Surrey Square project.

 

Mayor Williams closed his report by encouraging Council to consider the idea of active Marketing of our City.  Norwood is certainly re-emerging and turning a corner and we have a lot to offer both residents and businesses.  We have made significant progress and we should be proactive about letting others know about it.  The City of Hamilton advertises and perhaps we can direct Community Development funds for this purchase in the near future.

 

When opened for questions, Mr. Sanker mentioned that there has been significant discussion at the federal level regarding the Immigration Bill and asked Mayor Williams for his thoughts on how this issue might affect our City and City resources.  Mayor Williams responded that he has already had discussions with the Law Department regarding an Ordinance to legislate against renting to or hiring illegal immigrants.  In order to protect our citizens and legal immigrants we have to take action on the illegal immigrants and those supporting this behavior locally.

 

Mr. Schneider then asked the Mayor for his thoughts on HB154 which would eliminate local Mayors’ Courts since this is such an important part of the community.  Mayor Williams answered that both he and Clerk of Courts, Mr. Sorrell have been continually informed on this matter.  There are problems with smaller Mayors’ Court in the state, but those that hire a judiciary magistrate are providing a great service to their respective communities.  This is not a revenue generator, but rather allows communities to levy enforcement based on their community standards as allowed by the State Law.

 

Mr. Schneider mentioned that Sen. Kearney voted NO on SB117, perhaps in part due to our Resolution and asked if we should do the same for HB154.  The Mayor answered that Sen. Kearney called the Mayor’s Office twice for clarification and additional information and believes our Resolution was considered in his final decision.

 

Mr. Barlow asked for an update on the S.S.I. eGov bid.  Mayor Williams answered that we have signed the contract and are anxious to begin work.  We need to determine the capabilities, understand what upgrades may be necessary and then develop training.  This is not a quick project, but is necessary.

 

I)  OTHER REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL

There were no requests to address Council.

 

J)  UNFINISHED BUSINESS

 

K)  NEW BUSINESS

 

Mr. Schneider requested that a letter be sent to the Law Department asking them to send a letter to America R.R. requesting maintenance on their tracks in the City of Norwood.

 

Mr. Sanker mentioned that Public Works will offer a Freon Removal program on June 9 and 10 being offered through the Hamilton County Environmental Services.  This is normally a $45-65 charge for each appliance.

 

Mr. Sanker thanked Mr. Geers and Mr. White for their attention to the matter he raised at the last meeting regarding the West Bound Exit Ramp of SR 562.

 

L)  COMMUNICATIONS

 

1.      Letter from Jerry Owens RE: Memorial Day Celebration

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Barlow, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

2.      Letter from Donna Laake RE: Norwood Tree Board

 

On a motion by Mr. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Sanker, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and that a letter be sent to the Tree Board for a job well done and that the Secretary to the Clerk of Council research to see if there is an official flower and/or tree for the City of Norwood.  All members present voted YES.

 

3.      Letter from Mayor RE: Mayor’s Court Fines for April 2007

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

4.      Letter from Donnie Jones RE: Auditor’s Report for April 2007

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Ms. Kelly, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

5.      Letter from Liquor Control RE Hearing for Norwood Drive Thru

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

M)  EXCUSE ABSENT MEMBERS

All members present.

 

N)  ADJOURNMENT

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to adjourn.  All members present voted YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________            ______________________________

J. Brian Mumper                                          Jane M. Grote

Clerk of Council                                            President of Council