Norwood City Council

Council Chambers

June 26, 2007

 

 

 

A)  CALL TO ORDER

The Council for the City of Norwood met in regular session on the above date with Ms. Jane Grote presiding.  The meeting opened with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

B)   PRAYER

 

C)  PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 

D)  ROLL CALL

On roll call, the following members answered present:  Mr. Gabbard, Mr. Sanker, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Moore, Mr. Barlow and Mr. Mumper

 

E)   AMENDMENT OF AGENDA

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Barlow, it was moved to amend the agenda by adding Ordinance J-F), J-G), and J-H), and by adding Communications O-10).  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Barlow, it was moved to go into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation.  All members present voted YES

 

F)   requests to address council on agenda items

There were no requests to address Council.

 

G)  REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF COUNCIL

 

1.      Community Development RE: Re-Routing 561 & Lease of Smith Road

 

Mr. Moore explained that the traffic will flow straight through Smith to Montgomery.

 

Mr. Sanker added that the benefits of this will really be evident once the Montgomery Rd. realignment project is finalized.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to accept the

report.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to amend the agenda by moving Ordinances J-B), J-C), J-D), J-E), and J-H immediately following Ordinance H-A).  All members present voted YES.

 

H) SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE

 

A)    AN ORDINANCE DECLARING IMPROVEMENTS TO PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF NORWOOD, OHIO TO BE A PUBLIC PURPOSE UNDER CHAPTER 725 OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, PROVIDING FOR THE EXEMPTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS FROM REAL PROPERTY TAXATION, AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION AND PREPARATION, EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A SERVICE AGREEMENT, TAX INCENTIVE AGREEMENT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, TRUST AGREEMENT AND SUCH OTHER DOCUMENTS AS MAY BE NECESSARY, ESTABLISHING AN URBAN RENEWAL EQUIVALENT FUND AND A PROJECT FUND, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

Mr. Moore asked Mr. Neyer, Mr. Dettmer, Mr. Quinn, and Mr. Burke to the podium to explain these Ordinances.  Mr. Neyer thanked Council for their patience and diligence.  This time last year Council passed an intent to offer the TIF which induced this current development and ultimately led to a more dense development.  Now that the TIF is finalized we can begin working on the other aspects of the TIF most importantly the public improvements.

 

Mr. Moore expressed his appreciation for the cooperation on the verbal agreement as well and asked for the status of Phase I.  Mr. Neyer answered that the lots are paved and the lobbies of each building are being worked on now and the Phase I building should be fully operational near the end of July.  Neyer, Inc. has secured a letter of intent for an architecture firm as well as a bank for the retail location.

 

Mr. Moore asked if there were any updates on the restaurant pads.  Mr. Neyer responded that nothing has been signed yet, but there have been some discussions.  Within the retail space we are hoping for a quick service restaurant like a pizza or sub shop as well.

 

Mr. Sanker asked if the early progress on the Montgomery Rd. realignment has spurred any increased interest from prospective tenants.  Mr. Neyer answered that he feels strongly that this has helped drive interest but many won’t believe it until roads are complete, at that point we expect the flood gates to open. 

 

Mr. Moore explained that the TIF process allows the developer to forego City and County property taxes on the improvements to the property such that the developer has funds to work on public improvements.  But Mr. Moore asked Mr. Neyer to confirm that even without the TIF they would have received a tax break.  Mr. Neyer confirmed that due to the Ohio EPA acquisition, we were granted a tax exemption, but with the TIF we have agreed to forego that tax break.  In addition to the public improvements, this allows the Norwood City Schools to receive funds where under the Ohio EPA credit they would not have received this revenue.

 

Mr. Quinn added that in a very recent meeting with the State we have confirmed our original assumption, which was to base the valuation of pre-construction values.

 

Mr. Moore asked Mr. Dettmer to briefly explain the other significant details in the Redevelopment Agreement.  Mr. Dettmer responded that this TIF will fund public improvements, most notably the bridge enhancement, historical monument, and street and landscaping enhancements.  Mr. Dettmer thanked all those involved for their diligence and cooperation.

 

Mr. Moore asked Mr. Dettmer how long the City of Norwood has been working on this property.  Mr. Dettmer answered that this has been ongoing since before G.M. closed officially.  Neyer has been very patient in working with G.M. and both Neyer and the City have been adamant about not compromising on the type of development, setting an early goal for high density office.  Mr. Neyer added that he was first working this effort in 1996 during his first visit to Detroit to discuss the property.  Neyer closed on this property 3 years ago and have now been developing for one year.  This will be a great project when finished and something the City and Neyer will be very proud of for a long time down the road.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to amend the ordinance with new attachments.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Sanker, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

As amended Council then considered the following items:

J-B) AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE NECESSITY OF ACQUIRING AND CONSTRUCTING CERTAIN PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

Mr. Moore explained the necessity for these Ordinances and asked Mr. Quinn to provide background.  Mr. Quinn explained the process in which assessments are levied.  In short, this process requires the necessity, the determination to proceed, and then the levying of special assessments.

 

Mr. Moore asked for an explanation of the special assessment as opposed to a letter of credit.   Mr. Quinn explained that the special assessment relates to tax exempt short term bonds versus long term bonds.  It is related to how these bonds will be managed if payments aren’t made.  It is targeted at the bond holders and essentially renders these more saleable.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

J-C) ORDINANCE DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH IMPROVEMENTS TO CERTAIN PROPERTY, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2007, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

J-D) AN ORDINANCE LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Barlow, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

J-E) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT TO EXCEED $3,550,000 OF URBAN RENEWAL FINANCING REVENUE NOTES, SERIES 2007 (LINDEN POINTE LLC PROJECT) OF THE CITY OF NORWOOD, OHIO, UNDER CHAPTER 725 OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE COST OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING A PLEDGE OF AND LIEN ON CERTAIN SERVICE PAYMENTS TO SECURE SUCH NOTES; AUTHORIZING A TRUST AGREEMENT SECURING SUCH NOTES; AND RATIFYING A SERVICE AGREEMENT SECURING SUCH NOTES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

J-H) ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN OPEN SPACE AGREEMENT AS WELL AS AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CINCINNATI DIGESTIVE CENTER, LLC, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

Mr. Moore asked Mr. Dettmer and Mr. Kramer to address this Ordinance.

 

Mr. Kramer with Neyer, Inc. explained that the development of the MAB/Steinberg building is contingent on ample parking.  Current guidelines are 4 spots for every 1,000 square feet.  The current property is 12,000 feet which would require 48 parking spots; there are currently only 18 spots on the premises.  Mr. Kramer then showed maps and renderings of the property.

 

Mr. Moore asked a question to the Mayor and asked why the property would be leased rather than vacated.  Mayor Williams explained that when vacating, the property is divided between adjacent properties, not to mention the public utilities under that street.  Leasing has been determined to be the best option.  In addition, this is an ideal use of the space and will add to our medical use occupancy in the immediate area.

 

Mr. Schneider noted the greenspace on the renderings and asked who was to maintain this greenspace.  Mr. Kramer responded that this is a small pocket park that will be maintained by the lessee.

 

Mr. Moore asked Mr. Kramer to explain Neyer’s involvement in this effort if the Cincinnati Digestive Center is the party in this agreement.  Mr. Kramer explained that Neyer has been asked by the City to assess the best usage of the property and to examine possible interest given its proximity to the Linden Pointe project.  Cincinnati Digestive is an interested party that would want to purchase the property as long as certain conditions are met.

 

Mr. Gabbard asked if the current structure is to be demolished or remodeled.  Mr. Kramer responded that this is still in the early stages but most likely a new structure will be built in its place due to the high electrical and medical requirements of such a facility.

 

Mr. Moore thanked Neyer and Mr. Dettmer for finding this high end medical user and thanked Mr. Kramer for his efforts in serving as our broker. 

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

I) SECOND READINGS OF RESOLUTIONS

 

A)    A RESOLUTION OPPOSING HOUSE BILL 154 WHICH PROPOSES TO ABOLISH ALL MAYORS’ COURTS BY DECEMBER 31, 2007, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear the second and third reading of the resolution.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Sanker, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to pass the resolution and to forward copies to the appropriate representatives in the house.  All members present voted YES.

 

B)    RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE HAMILTON COUNTY NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear the second and third reading of the resolution.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to pass the resolution.  All members present voted YES.

 

J)  introductory readings of ORDINANCES

 

A)    ORDINANCE TO CHANGE APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE YEAR 2007

 

Mr. Schneider mentioned that he has received a few letters as a member of the Finance Committee and asked the Finance Chair if it is time that we increase the funds appropriated to the Recreation Department since they are running out of funds.

 

Mr. Sanker responded that most every department has been appropriated nearly their entire annual budget.  If a department is out of funds after 6 months perhaps we should look into the root cause and see if there is a potential management problem.  If every time a department is out of money our first step is to increase their budget then we will find ourselves in big trouble very quickly.  This Ordinance increases funds for essential services.  Most departments could use more funding but are getting by with what has been appropriated.  While the increase in minimum wage may affect the Recreation Department more so than other departments, this cannot be the reason they are nearly in the red just 6 months into the year.  This minimum wage help is seasonal.  The Finance committee always had plans to increase appropriations but not to the extent that was requested in the recent letter.

 

Mr. Schneider responded that the costs for the department have increased 2-3% per year but the budget has been flat.  While this work is seasonal the bulk of the spending is in the summer months.  Every department likely has a peak few months and this is the recreation department’s peak.

 

Mr. Sanker agreed but added that while this is their peak period for costs it is also their peak for revenue and maintained that there is no reason to change the Recreation Appropriation until we assess all needs and continue to work the full appropriations.

 

Mr. Schneider asked for clarification as he was under the impression that the revenue generated by the Recreation Department went directly into the General Fund.  Mr. Sanker answered that these funds have always gone back into Recreation.  It has always worked this way.

 

Mr. Sanker added that perhaps more money needs to be added to Recreation, but it must be looked at very carefully.  Norwood City Schools also used to contribute but no longer do which leaves the complete burden on the City.

 

Mr. Moore mentioned that the discussion is how to amend the appropriations.  The Recreation Department is asking for a 45% increase over last year.  We have not met to discuss the details regarding their needs and we should not arbitrarily increase funding for a department until we fully understand the need for such a dramatic increase and assess that against the priorities of other departments.

 

On a motion by Mr. Sanker, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

As amended, Council then considered the following items:

 

B)    AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE NECESSITY OF ACQUIRING AND CONSTRUCTING CERTAIN PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

As amended, this item was considered previously.

 

C)    ORDINANCE DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH IMPROVEMENTS TO CERTAIN PROPERTY, AS DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2007, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

As amended, this item was considered previously.

 

D)    AN ORDINANCE LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

As amended, this item was considered previously.

 

E)     AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT TO EXCEED $3,550,000 OF URBAN RENEWAL FINANCING REVENUE NOTES, SERIES 2007 (LINDEN POINTE LLC PROJECT) OF THE CITY OF NORWOOD, OHIO, UNDER CHAPTER 725 OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE COST OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING A PLEDGE OF AND LIEN ON CERTAIN SERVICE PAYMENTS TO SECURE SUCH NOTES; AUTHORIZING A TRUST AGREEMENT SECURING SUCH NOTES; AND RATIFYING A SERVICE AGREEMENT SECURING SUCH NOTES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

As amended, this item was considered previously.

 

F)     ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SAFETY-SERVICE DIRECTOR TO BY-PASS THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS AND ENTER INTO A LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT, UNDER THE MUNICIPAL LEASING PROGRAM, WITH TYMCO EQUIPMENT LEASING COMPANY FOR A MODEL 435 REGENERATIVE AIR STREET SWEEPER, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

Mr. Moore mentioned that the Mayor, Mr. Geers, and Mr. White have done significant research on this and hoping we can pass this tonight as we are in dire need. 

 

Mr. Schneider asked the Mayor if this is the same size unit as the current unit.  If this is the same size should we expect there to be problems with the narrow streets?  Will there be posted schedules set and signage posted?

 

Mayor Williams responded that there should not be major issues with narrow streets but we will need to establish a program that moves vehicles off the street.  A new street sweeper is normally delivered in 75 days but we have an opportunity to secure a truck currently on the line that the owner had to cancel delivery on.  We need to and will establish a program.

 

Mr. Schneider asked if there was any logic in purchasing a less expensive model knowing it will have to be replaced more often. 

 

Mayor Williams answered that he defers to the expertise of Mr. Geers and Mr. White on this matter.  The Mayor mentioned it was his understanding that the current street sweeper has rusted out due to improper maintenance over previous years.

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

G)    ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SAFETY-SERVICE DIRECTOR TO BY-PASS THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS AND TO ENTER INTO A LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT, UNDER THE MUNICIPAL LEASING PROGRAM, WITH LEADER MACHINERY COMPANY, LTD. EQUIPMENT LEASING COMPANY FOR A DURACO MODEL 125DJT MOUNTED SPRAY INJECTION PATCHING MACHINE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

H)    ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN OPEN SPACE AGREEMENT AS WELL AS AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CINCINNATI DIGESTIVE CENTER, LLC, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

As amended, this item was considered previously.

 

K)  ADMINISTRATION REPORTS

 

Mayor Williams was present and mentioned that he attended the Sorrento’s Pizza opening and it is nice to see that landmark business open again after all that family has been through recently.

 

Mayor Williams also mentioned that the Montgomery Rd. realignment project is going well, in fact the Dentist building has been primed and will be painted shortly.

 

Mayor Williams also relayed a recent experience where a resident called with an adjacent problem property.  Mayor Williams and Mr. Geers checked it out and knew it looked abandoned but appeared ok from the outside.  When they inspected closer there was a distinct odor and as they continued to look in the windows there was mold and a pungent mold swell that was overcoming the property.  Mayor Williams called Mr. Mumper to visit the house and Mr. Mumper had the same reaction to the solid mold smell.  The neighbors had been cutting the grass to make sure their property was not overtaken, but gradually noticed the smell.  Mayor Williams demanded that we determine an approach to deal with such situations.   The neighbors of these areas do not deserve this type of property in their neighborhoods.  Mr. Mumper was so disgusted with this situation that he is adding it to the Committee of the Whole agenda.  Whatever the correct approach we all need to make sure our residents don’t live near these messes.

 

Mayor Williams continued and asked all to think about how to approach the fact that the 8 mil levy rolls off after this year.  If we want to consider a renewal, Council should consider earmarking part of the funds for streets, capital improvement and a savings fund.  We need to discuss this and hope we can come together and propose the best proposal for the City of Norwood.

 

When opened for questions, Mr. Schneider asked about the safety requirements for the DuraPatch machine particularly regarding air brake needs and other safety precautions.  Mayor Williams responded that he was sure Mr. Geers has addressed these needs but will confirm.

 

Mr. Schneider also asked if there were grants available for an elevator at the Community Center.  Mayor Williams answered that he will look into it and that this Administration loves grants.

 

Mr. Mumper thanked Mayor Williams and the Administration for their efforts in removing the pony keg on Worth Avenue.  Mayor Williams in turn thanked Mr. Mumper for his efforts.  This administration also likes to tear down these eyesores.  We cannot keep having our hands tied and need to be aggressive in dealing with these problems.

 

Mr. Schneider noted that the Williams Ave. project looks complete and looks great and noted the presence of the speed wagon as well.  This has been a great effort.  Mayor Williams concurred and noted that crosswalks will be painted as the school year approaches.  Mayor Williams also noted that he received a call from a resident on Forest Ave. who requested a stop sign.  Originally, Mayor Williams concurred, but after speaking to the Police Department and ODOT the addition of a stop sign introduces risk.  While this is sometimes counter intuitive, there are traffic experts, insurance companies, and others who can quantify this risk.  Mayor Williams encouraged all to be safe, take their time, and to be considerate of others.

 

L)  OTHER REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL

There were no requests to address Council.

 

M) UNFINISHED BUSINESS

 

N) NEW BUSINESS

 

Mr. Mumper mentioned that he held his Town Hall meeting at Linden Pointe last Saturday and thanked the residents, Mayor Williams, Mr. Geers, Mr. Sanker, and his family for their support.  The representatives from Neyer were very informative and there were great questions from those in attendance. 

 

Mr. Gabbard mentioned that the Relay for Life was a great success and thanked the Mayor for his attendance.  Both the participants and monetary goals were exceeded this year.  This has become a major event both for the City of Norwood as well as the fight against cancer.

 

Mr. Mumper mentioned that he had just come from the funeral of a former Norwood City Engineer and Public Works Director, Mr. Robert Dettmer.  Bob served under Mayor Shea and Mayor Prues and was very well respected for his service to this community.

 

Mr. Moore mentioned that he followed up on citizen complaints and was able to eliminate a neighborhood disorder causing lots of problems.  Mr. Moore received a card from neighbors thanking the City for their efforts.  Mr. Moore thanked Public Works, the Administration, and the Building Department for delivering this peace and quiet to the neighborhood.

 

Mr. Moore asked that a letter be sent to the Law Department requesting the proper Ordinance or Resolution be drafter for next meeting regarding a possible levy renewal.

 

Mr. Mumper announced that all Council members should wear casual clothes and hard shoes to the next Committee of the Whole meeting.  In addition, members may want to bring a flashlight and a mask.  The hope is to travel to at least one home per ward to assess the current state of neglect in our communities.  One of the houses we will visit will be the house in the first ward that Mayor Williams mentioned in his report, another will be the infamous house on Quatman Ave.

 

Mr. Moore mentioned that his and the Mayor’s LIVE call in show is this Thursday at 7pm on Cable Channel 24.

 

O) COMMUNICATIONS

 

1.      Letter from Carri Town RE: Public Hearing Request

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and that the Public Hearing be scheduled for August 14, 2007.  All members present voted YES.

 

2.      Letter from John Hanrahan RE: Tax Report – May 2007

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

3.      Letter from Donna Laake RE: Consumer Confidence Report

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

4.      Letter from Casey Brown RE: Norwood Hometown Fireworks

 

On a motion by Mr. Sanker, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

5.      Letter from Liquor Control RE: Objection Withdrawal – Norwood Drive Thru

 

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Sanker, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

6.      Letter from Liquor Control RE: Objection Overruled – Palcincy DBA Ramco 2

 

On a motion by Mr. Sanker, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and that a letter be sent to the Law Department to see if there are grounds to file an appeal.  All members present voted YES.

 

7.      Letter from Chief Schlie RE: Permit for Quality Hotel Restaurant

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

8.      Letter from Dan Bly RE: Permit for Quality Hotel Restaurant

 

On a motion by Mr. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Sanker, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

9.      Letter from Liquor Control RE: Liquor Transfer for Quality Hotel

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and that Council does not request a hearing.  All members present voted YES.

 

As amended, Council then considered the following item:

 

10.  Letter from Donna Laake RE: High Grass/Weeds Abatement

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and to authorize abatements.  All members present voted YES.

 

P)  EXCUSE ABSENT MEMBERS

On a motion by Mr. Moore, seconded by Mr. Sanker, it was moved to excuse the absent member.  All members present voted YES.

 

Q)  ADJOURNMENT

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Moore, it was moved to adjourn.  All members present voted YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________            ______________________________

J. Brian Mumper                                          Jane M. Grote

Clerk of Council                                            President of Council