Norwood City Council

Council Chambers

January 22, 2008

 

 

 

A)  CALL TO ORDER

The Council for the City of Norwood met in regular session on the above date with Mr. Keith Moore, President Pro-Tem presiding.  The meeting opened with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

B)   PRAYER

 

C)  PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

 

D)  ROLL CALL

On roll call, the following members answered present:  Mr. Gabbard, Mr. Sanker, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Moore, Mr. Thornbury, Mr. Barlow and Mr. Mumper.

 

E)   AMENDMENT OF AGENDA

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Thornbury, it was moved to amend the agenda by adding Communication N-10) a letter from Joe Geers regarding Cincinnati Waterworks and Metropolitan Sewer District.  All members present voted YES.

 

F)   MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING

11/13/2007, 11/27/2007, 12/11/2007, 12/27/2007 and 1/1/2008

On a motion by Mr. Thornbury, seconded by Mr. Barlow it was moved to approve the minutes as if read.  All members present voted YES.

 

G)  requests to address council on agenda items

There were no requests to address Council.

 

H)  REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES OF COUNCIL

 

1. Community Development RE: Standing Meeting Time

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to accept the report.  All members present voted YES.

 

I) SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE

 

A) ORDINANCE MAINTAINING THE PART-TIME HOURLY TAX CLERK POSITION ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 34-2005 FOR THE REMAINDER OF CALENDAR YEAR 2008, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Thornbury, it was moved to amend the ordinance from $17 an hour to $16.50 and hour.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Thornbury, it was moved to suspend the rules and hear all three readings of the Ordinance as amended.  All members present voted YES.

 

On a motion by Mr. Thornbury, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved to pass the ordinance.  All members present voted YES.

 

J) ADMINISTRATION REPORTS

 

Mayor Williams was present and reported that Jerry Stoker, the new building commissioner started today and that he will be at City Hall on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.  The Mayor is encouraged by Mr. Stoker’s presence and feels that Mr. Stoker along with Chris Brown, the Assistant Law Director, has the background that will make a positive difference here.

 

The Mayor mentioned that he was invited to swear in the new members of the Chamber of Commerce which took place on January 14th.

 

The Mayor noted that the City of Cincinnati held a news conference and that they are targeting certain areas to develop, so we will be in competition with them for businesses.  We feel like we have the best location and take great pride in working with companies to get them through the process. 

 

The Mayor stated that an ad was placed in Sunday’s newspaper for a Budget Analyst and that the Administration has received one resume and one phone call thus far. 

 

When opened for questions, Mr. Thornbury inquired on the details in the ad for the Budget Analyst.  Mayor Williams answered that they referred to Sharonville’s position and we are consistent and looking for the same in respect to the number of years of education, experience, and qualifications.  This will be an open process and Council will have input.  The Mayor said that he feels strongly that something has to be done and that now is the time to do it. 

 

Mr. Barlow brought up the actions of the Fed cutting the rate by ¾ of a percent, the stock market situation, and forecasts of possible recessions and asked the Mayor what type of affect it would have on our city.  The Mayor answered that we must watch the situation carefully and that it will affect each of our businesses differently.  We certainly need to exercise caution for the next several months.

 

Mr. Mumper stated that we are still officially in Fiscal Watch and asked the Mayor if the State Auditor was still available for assistance.  The Mayor responded that there are certain technical services that they are required to provide while we are in Fiscal Watch. 

 

Mr. Thornbury asked the Mayor if the Budget Analyst position that was advertised for was listed as full or part time.  Mayor Williams responded that it was not specified and that a salary was not indicated.  We want to wait and see what an individual may bring to the table and how their qualifications may serve multiple departments of our city before making these determinations. 

 

Mr. Gabbard asked if the new Building Commissioner resides in the City of Norwood.  The Mayor answered that Mr. Stoker does not reside in the City and added that the previous Building Commissioner did not reside in Norwood either.  The Mayor also noted that residency requirements are in development for all department heads and deputies.

 

Mr. Gabbard asked the Mayor if we were actively marketing our City.  Mr. Gabbard noted that we should emphasize our central location and safety services in particular.  The Mayor responded that there has been discussion about advertising, we have had a lot of free advertising recently with the positive news stories.  There have been many good articles about the City of Norwood, not only in the Cincinnati Enquirer, but also in the Business Courier.  The Mayor said that we need to market both to businesses as well as potential residents. 

 

Mr. Mumper asked if there was any update on Rookwood Exchange.  The Mayor answered that there was no recent progress and that the developers were still working with the remaining property owners.

 

Mr. Sanker mentioned in regards to advertising our city, that we already have four marketing firms that are marketing the City of Norwood for their particular developments.  They want to build up the area as much as we do.  Mr. Sanker does think it’s important to market our housing stock.  The Mayor agreed and added that updates to our website would be a major benefit to our marketing efforts.

 

Mr. Moore added as a follow up to Mr. Sanker that at the last Community Development meeting, Neyer Inc. brought in a new firm to assist in developing attractive City landmarks as a component of the brand of our community.  They have a vested interest to do this and to do it well. 

 

Mr. Kiser was in attendance.  Mr. Moore asked if there were any questions for Mr. Kiser and there were none at this time. 

 

Mr. Moore introduced Mr. Stith, the new Auditor for the City of Norwood.  Mr. Moore asked Mr. Stith if he would like to give a report.

 

Mr. Stith said that right now the Auditor’s office is working on a certificate of resources and expenditures.  The Auditor’s Office is meeting with the State Auditor on Friday to get this report filed as soon as possible as it’s due on January 31st. 

 

Mr. Sanker asked if there was any input from the Treasurer, the Finance Committee or local businesses on what they anticipated for the Certificate of estimated resources.  Mr. Stith added that this estimate is based on the official certificate that was filed at the end of last year which was prior to his term as Auditor. 

 

Mr. Sanker asked if Mr. Stith was using the final number from last year.  Mr. Sanker wants to know if any increase from the Treasurer’s office was figured in.  Last year the Treasurer gave us an estimate on Earnings Tax, and asked if the Auditor’s office was using that same number this year.  Mr. Stith responded that he doesn’t have an updated number as of the first of the year and that these numbers are based on what was here last year and what was filed with the County under the previous Auditor. 

 

Mr. Mumper added that we don’t want last year’s earning tax receipts as the guideline to next year.  We hope the numbers are just as good, but that we should take a conservative approach. 

 

Mr. Barlow asked Mr. Stith for the time of the Friday meeting with the State Auditors representatives.  Mr. Stith said that the meeting was at 9:00 am.  Mr. Barlow announced that there will be a Finance & Audit Committee Meeting on Friday at 6:00 pm. 

 

Mr. Sanker said that he just wants to be sure we are not submitting or certifying numbers and holding Council responsible for an estimate that Council has no input in developing. 

 

Mr. Mumper clarified that Council does not want to use last year’s figures for earnings tax as the starting estimate of resources.  Last year is what we think might have been an aberration with it being 14% higher than what was expected.  We can revise this at any point in time and with the uncertainty in the economy, we should be conservative. 

 

Mr. Sanker added that the problem is that we really don’t know what numbers the auditor’s are actually working with.  Mr. Sanker added that the average increase is between 2 and 5% with good years of 6 to 7%.  He explained that 2007 was a very good year and we shouldn’t base anything on the final 2007 numbers as the base for 2008.   

 

K) OTHER REQUESTS TO ADDRESS COUNCIL

There were no requests to address Council.

 

L) UNFINISHED BUSINESS

There was no Unfinished Business to discuss.

 

M) NEW BUSINESS

 

Mr. Schneider placed Burwood Park and the topic of a Community Theatre at the Community Center into the Parks & Playgrounds Committee. 

 

Mr. Moore placed the topic of promoting and advertising our community into the Community Development Committee. 

 

Mr. Schneider announced that the Auditor’s ceremonial swearing in would be this Sunday at 6:00 pm in Council Chambers followed by a reception. 

 

N) COMMUNICATIONS

 

1.  Letter from Mayor RE: Mayor’s Court Fines

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

2.  Letter from John Hanrahan RE: December 2007 and Yearly Tax Report

 

Mr. Sanker mentioned that he thinks it’s important to recognize the impact that businesses make on our community.  We are very fortunate that we have a good mix of manufacturing, retail, and office in the City of Norwood.  We are bringing in good quality businesses that positively impact our year end earnings.  We also have an increase in individual earnings tax for 2007 that can certainly be attributed to mandatory filing.

 

Mr. Moore added that analysis of mandatory filing certainly impacts our certificate of estimated resources.  For example, with the mandatory filing, how much of this increase is due to individuals who had never filed and had to go back 3 or 4 years?  How much of this is a business taking a particular increase or hit?  This was definitely an outstanding year for the City of Norwood and we should all be thankful for that.        

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

3.  Letter from Ted Kiser RE: Yearly Report

 

On a motion by Mr. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved that the letter be received and filed as if read.  All members present voted YES.

 

4.  Letter from Board of Elections RE: Kroger Petition

 

Mr. Mumper stated that this was just a sample from Hamilton County of what is going to be placed on the ballot.

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed.  All members present voted YES.

 

5.  Letter from Chief Schlie RE: Rusty Bucket

 

6.  Letter from Donna Laake RE: Rusty Bucket

 

7.  Letter from Dan Bly RE: Rusty Bucket

 

8.   Letter from Liquor Control RE: Rusty Bucket

 

Mr. Mumper noted that the Rusty Bucket is going into the former Fuddruckers location.  He also noted that the next letter is the Longhorns location. 

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letters be received and filed and to file NO objection.  All members present voted YES.

 

9.   Letter from Liquor Control RE: Rare Hospitality

 

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Schneider, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and to only object if any objections are received from the various departments.  All members present voted YES. 

 

As amended, Council then considered the following item:

 

10.  Letter from Joe Geers RE: Cincinnati Waterworks and MSD

 

On a motion by Mr. Sanker, seconded by Mr. Mumper, it was moved that the letter be received and filed and that the request be granted.  All members present voted YES.

 

O)  EXCUSE ABSENT MEMBERS

All members were present.

 

P)  ADJOURNMENT

On a motion by Mr. Mumper, seconded by Mr. Thornbury, it was moved to adjourn.  All members present voted YES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________            ______________________________

J. Brian Mumper                                          Jane M. Grote

Clerk of Council                                            President of Council